![]() ![]() Initially i converted to wmv and burned from there with surprisingly good results at full screen on my tv. I had an idea of converting flv you tube video to a format that win dvd maker would recognize, so i could burn a dvd and play it on the dvd that is connected to my tv. If all players that played DivX also played Xvid, I’d go with whatever one produced the smaller files given the extremely minor differences in quality. If DivX is actually more widely supported, then that’s the one I’d recommend. I would say it all boils down to compatiblity. Whether I would notice that at 30 frames per second might be another story. I notice the biggest difference on the shot where the light is shining on his chest armor, and even then, I have to pay close attention to the detail to notice anything. Below are the results.Īs you can see, neither comes out way ahead. I chose six different scenes and attempted to take a screenshot at exactly the same point for comparision. Curious, I decided to convert a movie using FairUseWizard and see for myself what the difference was. While DivX is arguably the more popular of the two, many gurus claim that Xvid offers quality improvements when compared to DivX. DivX and Xvid are competing MPEG4 compression formats. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2023
Categories |